Geez... the liberal media is at it again with their bias and denial of such!
US Weekly magazine ran a front page cover last week.
The Senior Editor of US weekly (a magazine I admit to never having read in my life, I admit and now, never will!), could not answer when questioned by Megyn Kelly of Fox News to what exactly the "lies" touted on the front cover were. What it melted down to is that he admitted that it was not Sarah who lied but the "lies" actually referred to those of the lefist bloggers words on Sarah found deep inside the article! He didn't choose to agree with Megyn that this was misleading in any way. But we shouldn't be surprised should we?
On top of that, the article mentioned that Mr. Palin was pulled for for a DUI, but the Magazine did not give account to when this happened, which was over 22 years ago! They failed to mention that Barack Obama was actually smoking pot 22 yrs. ago at his admittal. No media bias?
When asked why they didn't mention that the DUI was 22 yrs. ago, the Publisher said he was sure it was mentioned, in the article. Megyn Kelly said clearly that she read the article thoroughly and that the time of the DUI was NEVER mentioned! Listen to this jerk's attempt to explain it in the Obama "above my paygrade" fashion:
Video coverage:
Absolutely unreal! how do liberals not see this?!!!
Cover in question:
Earlier, this was the cover US Weekly Magazine printed:
Nope! No bias there, right? (roll of eyes). Such a bias is COMPLETE dirty play and unfair.
Then this... Matt Drudge reports that Oprah, a major supporter of Obama is in a corner about having Palin on her show. Headline below:
BIG DILEMMA: OPRAH BALKS AT HOSTING SARAH PALIN; STAFF DIVIDED
Fri Sep 05 2008 08:55:46 ET
Oprah Winfrey may have introduced Democrat Barack Obama to the women of America -- but the talkshow queen is not rushing to embrace the first woman on a Republican presidential ticket!
Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.
"Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider explains. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama."
One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash!
It is not clear if Oprah has softened her position after watching Palin's historic convention speech.
Last year, Winfrey blocked an appearance by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, timed to a promotional tour of his autobiography.
Oprah and executive producer Sheri Salata, who has contributed thousands of dollars to Obama's campaign, refused requests for comment.
Developing...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's neverending. Palin's popularity is higher than even Barack currently according to polls and I feel we should brace ourselves for more. No one said it would be easy for Sarah to blaze this trail, however few anticipated the excitement she would be surrounded by.
Friday, September 5, 2008
The "unbiased" liberal media
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You're absolutely right. I think it's about to get MUCH worse, although for now, I think the media is grasping at straws because, there's really nothing else to find. They can nitpick, but Sarah Palin is an honest woman, and aside from attacking her family, there's nothing else for them to truly be scandalized about.
Ugh. Did you see the stupid article the other day that picked on her hairstyle? So petty!
buh uh uh buh I can't discuss that, many people haven't bought my magazine uh, duh. Maybe we should get him a teleprompter. It's amazing what we are letting them get away with. First they are impressed that Palin can understand and use the teleprompter, then dismissive because she doesn't need it.
I love that Obama feels threatened by her. Why is a Presidential candidate now running against a VP candidate? She is that amazing.
Post a Comment